Home / Business / Local Business / Economic management of the last five years

Economic management of the last five years


By George Theocharides

Five years have almost passed since the banking crisis of March 2013 and we are getting close now to the next presidential elections.

This is a good time I believe to step back and review the economic management of the last five years. What is the current state of the economy and how much progress has been made during this time?

The truth is that the government inherited a very difficult situation that was almost impossible to manage – a country in a recession, with a very high level of unemployment, fiscal imbalances, rising public debt level, prohibitive interest rates to borrow from financial markets, extremely high private debt level, and a banking system in ruins with huge losses for depositors and shareholders.

All these painted a very negative picture for the prospects of our economy. So, how did things progress in the last five years and where do we stand now?

On the macroeconomic front, the stats look much healthier and this is due to a large extent to the prudent and sound economic policy followed by the government. Since 2015, we have positive growth rates which are projected to be in the region of 2.5% to 3% for the next few years. Unemployment is declining steadily and from a level of 16% in 2013, down to 11% (May 2017).

In terms of fiscal balances, we moved from large deficits to small surpluses with a primary surplus of around 2% expected for the next few years (Moody’s report) which can help lower the public debt. Cyprus also had a number of rating upgrades by the rating agencies since 2013 and we are now one notch below the investment-grade category from S&P (BB+), three from Moody’s (Ba3), and three from Fitch (BB-).

These upgrades have brought multiple benefits to the economy, a major one being the lowering of the government interest rates to levels below 3% signaling the confidence placed by international financial markets in the local economy (compare this to a level of 16% five years ago!).

Cause for concern though remains the high level of public debt (at €19.3 billion or 107.8% of GDP for 2016) that has slightly increased in the last few years and is higher than the eurozone or EU average (89.2% and 83.5%, respectively).

Another major concern is the high level of private debt (estimated to be close to 300% of the GDP for non-financial companies and households).

Of course this was a problem that was created many years ago with banks accepting large deposits (mainly foreign money) prior to the crisis and providing these funds to companies and households as loans.



This practice led to a bubble in the real estate sector with the known outcomes. The problem still exists as companies and households were faced with substantial loss of revenues due to the crisis plus there was the major loss of deposits.

The high level of private debt led to the rise of the non-performing loans (NPLs) to extremely high levels (around 50% of the total loan portfolio of the banking sector). This is by far the most important problem faced by our economy although this level is gradually dropping through the many efforts exerted by the banks (still above 40% though).

In my opinion, our lawmakers, political parties, independent government authorities as well as labour unions need to understand that they should work with the banks and help them address this major problem rather than putting major obstacles along the way (see the recent cases of Hellenic Bank and Co-operative Central Bank). Solving or at least alleviating this problem will be a major boost for the economy.

In terms of structural reforms (privatization, public sector reforms, etc.), I believe the intention and the effort was there by the government and its officials.

However they did not have the necessary support by the rest of the political parties (apart from the National Health System). I think part of the blame for this outcome though should go to the Troika as well for not pressing enough on these issues (in a similar way that they did for the other pillars of their programme).

Overall, I would rate highly the economic management of the last five years. Could things have been better for us? Were mistakes been made? Certainly, but we should not forget the situation and problems faced back in March 2013.

The writer is an Associate Professor of Finance at Cyprus International Institute of Management (CIIM) and the Director of the MSc in Financial Services.


Check Also

Tourists wanting to go north turned away at Larnaca airport

A number of overseas visitors were reportedly turned away by officials at Larnaca Airport earlier …

Unemployment rate drops to 10.6% in Q2

The number of people out of work in the second quarter of 2017 was 10.6% …

One comment

  1. We were rather lucky to have a major increase in tourism due the known external factors. Some of the financial prudence has been rolled back recently. E.g. the reduction of national service which was replaced by the employment of about 3000 higher cost professionals, the abolishment of tax on houses and property, promised spending on some projects which are not necessarily the most efficient for the economy and finally the failure to reform the public sector e.g. transferability, careful calculation of the needs in terms of personnel etc. This does not bode well for the future.